4.8 Article

PD-L1 Is Expressed and Promotes the Expansion of Regulatory T Cells in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Journal

FRONTIERS IN IMMUNOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2020.01710

Keywords

acute myeloid leukemia; regulatory T cells; PD-L1; PD-1; interleukin-35

Categories

Funding

  1. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY16H080007, LY20H080005]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [81300430]
  3. Wenzhou Municipal Science and Technology Bureau [Y20150006, Y20150031]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Intratumoral accumulation of CD4(+)CD25(+)Foxp3(+)regulatory T (Treg) cells occurs in acute myeloid leukemia (AML), but little is known about the role of tumor cells themselves in this process. Here, we showed that an immune checkpoint PD-L1 expressed by AML cells promoted the conversion and expansion of Treg cells sustaining high expression of Foxp3 and PD-1 as well as a suppressive function. Furthermore, an AML cell line HEL overexpressed PD-L1 promoted the conversion and expansion of Treg cells and CD4(+)PD-1(+)Foxp3(+)T (PD-1(+)Treg) cells from the conventional CD4(+)T cells. CD4(+)CD25(high)PD-1(+)T cells secreted more IL-10 production than CD4(+)CD25(high)PD-1(-)T cells. IL-35, another cytokine secreted by Treg cells, promoted the proliferation of HL-60 cells and enhanced chemoresistance to cytarabine. Blockade of PD-1 signaling using anti-PD-L1 antibody dramatically impaired the generation of Treg cells and sharply retarded the progression of a murine AML model injected with C1498 cells. The frequency of intratumoral PD-1(+)Treg cells was capable of predicting patient survival in patients with AML. In conclusion, our data suggest that PD-L1 expression by AML cells may directly drive Treg cell expansion as a mechanism of immune evasion and the frequency of PD-1(+)Treg cells is a potential prognostic predictor in patients with AML.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available