4.7 Article

Air Pollutant Correlations in China: Secondary Air Pollutant Responses to NOx and SO2 Control

Journal

ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY LETTERS
Volume 7, Issue 10, Pages 695-700

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.estlett.0c00403

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Key RAMP
  2. D Program of China [2018YFC0506901]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [41877304]
  4. Youth Innovation Promotion Association, CAS [2018060, 2018055, 2017064]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

PM2.5 concentrations have decreased remarkably in China in recent years, coinciding with a more rapid decrease in SO2 concentrations and a slower decrease in NO2 concentrations, while O-3 concentrations increased. Correlations between PM2.5 and key gaseous pollutants were studied to identify linked trends as a means of understanding the impacts of air pollution control in China. In most cities, the PM2.5-NO2 correlation coefficients were higher than the PM2.5-SO2 correlation coefficients, and the gap tended to expand as air quality improved. Multiple linear regression also indicated that PM2.5 concentrations were more sensitive to changes in NO2 than in SO2. The rate of decrease in the PM2.5 concentration with a decreasing NO2 concentration is nearly 3 times higher than that with SO2. These results support the priority of controlling NOx to further reduce PM2.5 pollution in China. The chemistry behind this was twofold: (1) NOx can be converted into nitrate, and (2) NOx contributes to atmospheric oxidation capacity. The decrease in PM2.5 concentration always coincided with an increase in O-3 concentration when the PM2.5 concentration was higher than 50 mu g m(-3). However, the correlation between PM2.5 and O-3 tended to change from negative to positive as air quality improved, indicating O-3 and PM2.5 control could both benefit from reducing the concentrations of gas precursors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available