4.6 Article

Evaluation on Rock Tensile Failure of the Brazilian Discs under Different Loading Configurations by Digital Image Correlation

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 16, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10165513

Keywords

failure mechanism; loading configuration; rock types; Brazilian test; digital image correlation

Funding

  1. Outstanding Youth Science Foundations of Hunan Province of China [2019JJ20028]
  2. Key projects of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [41630642]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Featured Application The present work is conducive to focused use of the Brazilian test to obtain the tensile strength and other information of a rock specimen. The fracture behavior of the disc specimens in the Brazilian test is closely related to the reliability and accuracy of the experimental results. To comprehensively investigate the effect of various loading methods and rock material types on the failure mechanism of the Brazilian discs, five different rock types tested with three typical loading methods were employed in this work. The digital image correlation (DIC) method was applied to record and analyze the strain and displacement field of the specimens during the loading process. Experimental results indicate that the peak load and deformation characteristics of the Brazilian discs are strongly affected by the loading types. The Brazilian test with the Chinese standard is evidently not suitable for measuring the tensile strength of rocks, and the other two testing methods may lead to an invalid failure mode for rock materials with high stiffness and tensile to compressive strength ratio. Furthermore, it revealed that the maximum equivalent stress point of a disc specimen is co-controlled by the material stiffness and its tensile-compression ratio. The present work shows that it is necessary to select a suitable loading configuration for each rock type in the Brazilian test.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available