4.6 Article

Probabilistic Representation Approach for Multiple Types of Epistemic Uncertainties Based on Cubic Normal Transformation

Journal

APPLIED SCIENCES-BASEL
Volume 10, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/app10144698

Keywords

uncertainty analysis; epistemic uncertainty; cubic normal transformation; statistical moments

Funding

  1. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB0603704]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51875525, U1610112, U1608256]
  3. Zhejiang Provincial Natural Science Foundation of China [LY20E050020]
  4. Open Foundation of the State Key Laboratory of Fluid Power and Mechatronic Systems [GZKF-201916]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many non-probabilistic approaches have been widely regarded as mathematical tools for the representation of epistemic uncertainties. However, their heavy computational burden and low computational efficiency hinder their applications in practical engineering problems. In this article, a unified probabilistic representation approach for multiple types of epistemic uncertainties is proposed based on the cubic normal transformation method. The epistemic uncertainties can be represented using an interval approach, triangular fuzzy approach, or evidence theory. The uncertain intervals of four statistical moments, which contain mean, variance, skewness, and kurtosis, are calculated using the sampling analysis method. Subsequently, the probabilistic cubic normal distribution functions are conducted for sampling points of four statistical moments of epistemic uncertainties. Finally, a calculation procedure for the construction of probabilistic representation functions is proposed, and these epistemic uncertainties are represented with belief and plausibility continuous probabilistic measure functions. Two numerical examples and one engineering example demonstrate that the proposed approach can act as an accurate probabilistic representation function with high computational efficiency.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available