4.6 Article

Direct Comparison of Four Hematopoietic Differentiation Methods from Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells

Journal

STEM CELL REPORTS
Volume 15, Issue 3, Pages 735-748

Publisher

CELL PRESS
DOI: 10.1016/j.stemcr.2020.07.009

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Arrow Bone Marrow Transplant Foundation
  2. St. Vincent's Clinic Foundation
  3. St. Vincent's Hospital Sydney Hematology Department Research Funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Induced pluripotent stem cells (iPSCs) are an invaluable resource for the study of human disease. However, there are no standardized methods for differentiation into hematopoietic cells, and there is a lack of robust, direct comparisons of different methodologies. In the current study we improved a feeder-free, serum-free method for generation of hematopoietic cells from iPSCs, and directly compared this with three other commonly used strategies with respect to efficiency, repeatability, hands-on time, and cost. We also investigated their capability and sensitivity to model genetic hematopoietic disorders in cells derived from Down syndrome and beta-thalassemia patients. Of these methods, a multistep monolayer-based method incorporating aryl hydrocarbon receptor hyperactivation (2D-multistep) was the most efficient, generating significantly higher numbers of CD34(+) progenitor cells and functional hematopoietic progenitors, while being the most timeand cost-effective and most accurately recapitulating phenotypes of Down syndrome and beta-thalassemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available