4.2 Article

Oxytropis shennongjiaensis (Fabaceae), a new species from Hubei, Central China

Journal

PHYTOKEYS
Volume -, Issue 149, Pages 117-128

Publisher

PENSOFT PUBLISHERS
DOI: 10.3897/phytokeys.149.49533

Keywords

Shennongjia National Park; phylogeny; new species; Oxytropis shennongjiaensis

Categories

Funding

  1. Major Program on Technology Innovation of Hubei Province [2018ACA132]
  2. Hubei Key Laboratory of Shennongjia Snub-nosed Monkey Conservation Fund [2018SNJ0009]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31670206, 31700165]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China-Yunnan [U1802232]
  5. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA20050203]
  6. National Key R&D Program of China [2017YFC0505200]
  7. Major Program of the National Natural Science Foundation of China [31590823]
  8. Youth Innovation Promotion Association of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [2019382]
  9. Young Academic and Technical Leader Raising Foundation of Yunnan Province [2019HB039]
  10. Chinese Academy of Sciences Light of West China Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Here we describe Oxytropis shennongjiaensis, a new species of Fabaceae from Central China (Hubei Province). Morphologically, O. shennongjiaensis is closely similar to O. sitaipaiensis, O. melanocalyx and O. kansuensis, but differs in stem characters, with less conspicuous internodes; persistent herbaceous stipules; pale yellow to white corolla; and stipitate legumes, 3-5 mm with a long beak. Phylogenetic analysis, based on the internal transcribed spacers (ITS) and two chloroplast markers (trnL-F and psbA-trnH), also identified O. shennongjiaensis as a new species, which is consistent with our morphological analyses. Considering the morphological data and phylogenetic data presented here, we believe that this evidence satisfies the required diagnostic criteria to identify O. shennongjiaensis as a new species.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.2
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available