4.6 Article

Assessment of fish biodiversity in four Korean rivers using environmental DNA metabarcoding

Journal

PEERJ
Volume 8, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

PEERJ INC
DOI: 10.7717/peerj.9508

Keywords

Biodiversity; Korea; Next-generation sequencing; MiFish pipeline; eDNA metabarcoding

Funding

  1. Ministry of Oceans and Fisheries, Korea

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding is a cost-effective novel approach to estimate biodiversity in an ecosystem. In this study, the MiFish pipeline was employed to test if the system methodology is sufficiently reliable to estimate fish biodiversity in Korean rivers. A total of 125 unique haplotypes and 73 species were identified at the species level from 16 water samples collected from a single survey in four Korean rivers (Hyeongsan, Taehwa, Seomjin, and Nakdong). Among the four rivers, the highest species richness was recorded in the Seomjin River (52 species), followed by the Taehwa (42 species) and Hyeongsan (40 species) rivers. The Nakdong River (26 species) presented the lowest species richness and number of endemic species, presumably due to its metropolitan location and anthropogenic impacts, such as dams or weirs. We were also able to detect that five exotic species (Carassius cuvieri, Cyprinus carpio, Cyprinus megalophthalmus, Lepomis macrochirus, and Micropterus salmoides) are widely distributed in all surveyed rivers, a situation that might be problematic in terms of conservation. Our findings indicate that the eDNA metabarcoding technique is one of the most cost-effective scientific tools available for the management and conservation of the freshwater fish resources available in Korea. However, the low number of 12S sequences of endemic species in the database and low resolution of the MiFish region for differentiating several taxa should be upgraded for their wide use.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available