4.7 Article

Toxicity to RAW264.7 Macrophages of Silica Nanoparticles and the E551 Food Additive, in Combination with Genotoxic Agents

Journal

NANOMATERIALS
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nano10071418

Keywords

silica; SiO2; nanoparticle; E551; toxicity; genotoxicity; macrophage; intestine; co-exposure

Funding

  1. FRISBI within the Grenoble Partnership for Structural Biology (PSB) [ANR-10-INSB-05-02]
  2. GRAL within the Grenoble Partnership for Structural Biology (PSB) [ANR-10-LABX-49-01]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Synthetic amorphous silica (SAS) is used in a plethora of applications and included in many daily products to which humans are exposed via inhalation, ingestion, or skin contact. This poses the question of their potential toxicity, particularly towards macrophages, which show specific sensitivity to this material. SAS represents an ideal candidate for the adsorption of environmental contaminants due to its large surface area and could consequently modulate their toxicity. In this study, we assessed the toxicity towards macrophages and intestinal epithelial cells of three SAS particles, either isolated SiO(2)nanoparticles (LS30) or SiO(2)particles composed of agglomerated-aggregates of fused primary particles, either food-grade (E551) or non-food-grade (Fumed silica). These particles were applied to cells either alone or in combination with genotoxic co-contaminants, i.e., benzo[a]pyrene (B[a]P) and methane methylsulfonate (MMS). We show that macrophages are much more sensitive to these toxic agents than a non-differenciated co-culture of Caco-2 and HT29-MTX cells, used here as a model of intestinal epithelium. Co-exposure to SiO(2)and MMS causes DNA damage in a synergistic way, which is not explained by the modulation of DNA repair protein mRNA expression. Together, this suggests that SiO(2)particles could adsorb genotoxic agents on their surface and, consequently, increase their DNA damaging potential.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available