4.6 Review

Measurement and Interpretation of Exercise Ventilatory Efficiency

Journal

FRONTIERS IN PHYSIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2020.00659

Keywords

ventilatory efficiency; ventilation; exercise testing; dyspnea; pulmonary gas-exchange

Categories

Funding

  1. Canadian Institutes of Health Research
  2. Lung Association of Alberta and Northwest Territories
  3. Canadian Lung Association Breathing as One Studentship
  4. Canadian Respiratory Research Network Studentship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cardiopulmonary exercise testing (CPET) is a method for evaluating pulmonary and cardiocirculatory abnormalities, dyspnea, and exercise tolerance in healthy individuals and patients with chronic conditions. During exercise, ventilation (V-E) increases in proportion to metabolic demand [i.e., carbon dioxide production (VCO2)] to maintain arterial blood gas and acid-base balance. The response ofV(E)relative toVCO(2)(V-E/VCO2) is commonly termed ventilatory efficiency and is becoming a common physiological tool, in conjunction with other key variables such as operating lung volumes, to evaluate exercise responses in patients with chronic conditions. A growing body of research has shown that theV(E)/VCO(2)response to exercise is elevated in conditions such as chronic heart failure (CHF), pulmonary hypertension (PH), interstitial lung disease (ILD), and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Importantly, this potentiatedV(E)/VCO(2)response contributes to dyspnea and exercise intolerance. The clinical significance of ventilatory inefficiency is demonstrated by findings showing that the elevatedV(E)/VCO(2)response to exercise is an independent predictor of mortality in patients with CHF, PH, and COPD. In this article, the underlying physiology, measurement, and interpretation of exercise ventilatory efficiency during CPET are reviewed. Additionally, exercise ventilatory efficiency in varying disease states is briefly discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available