4.6 Article

BETA: A Large Benchmark Database Toward SSVEP-BCI Application

Journal

FRONTIERS IN NEUROSCIENCE
Volume 14, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fnins.2020.00627

Keywords

brain-computer interface (BCI); steady-state visual evoked potential (SSVEP); electroencephalogram (EEG); public database; frequency recognition; classification algorithms; signal-to-noise ratio (SNR)

Categories

Funding

  1. Doctoral Brain + X Seed Grant Program of Tsinghua University, National Key Research and Development Program of China [2017YFB1002505]
  2. Strategic Priority Research Program of Chinese Academy of Science [XDB32040200]
  3. Key Research and Development Program of Guangdong Province [2018B030339001]
  4. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61431007]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The brain-computer interface (BCI) provides an alternative means to communicate and it has sparked growing interest in the past two decades. Specifically, for Steady-State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP) based BCI, marked improvement has been made in the frequency recognition method and data sharing. However, the number of pubic databases is still limited in this field. Therefore, we present aBEnchmark databaseTowards BCIApplication (BETA) in the study. The BETA database is composed of 64-channel Electroencephalogram (EEG) data of 70 subjects performing a 40-target cued-spelling task. The design and the acquisition of the BETA are in pursuit of meeting the demand from real-world applications and it can be used as a test-bed for these scenarios. We validate the database by a series of analyses and conduct the classification analysis of eleven frequency recognition methods on BETA. We recommend using the metric of wide-band signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and BCI quotient to characterize the SSVEP at the single-trial and population levels, respectively. The BETA database can be downloaded from the following link.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available