4.5 Review

Recent Advances in Transition Metal Phosphide Electrocatalysts for Water Splitting under Neutral pH Conditions

Journal

CHEMELECTROCHEM
Volume 7, Issue 17, Pages 3578-3589

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/celc.202000734

Keywords

hydrogen evolution reaction; oxygen evolution reaction; water-splitting; neutral; phosphide

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea [NRF-2020R1A2B5B03002475, NRF-2019R1A6A1A110 44070, NRF-2019M3E6A1064709]
  2. Korea Basic Science Institute under the RD program [C38530]
  3. Korea University
  4. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFA0203101]
  5. National Research Foundation of Korea [2019M3E6A1064709] Funding Source: Korea Institute of Science & Technology Information (KISTI), National Science & Technology Information Service (NTIS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Considerable attention on sustainable clean energy resources has led to the development of a plethora of catalytic materials, specifically geared toward water electrolysis. Among various developed catalysts, noble-metal-based electrocatalysts have shown promising performances for oxygen and hydrogen evolution reactions (OER and HER). However, their high price and scarcity have always been roadblocks to the commercialization of the water-splitting technology. Recently, transition metal phosphides (TMP) and phosphates (TMPi) have emerged as alternative electrocatalysts for the OER and HER under neutral conditions; water splitting under a neutral conditions eco-friendly and free of the corrosion issues that are present for acidic or alkaline conditions. Herein, we present the recent progress in TMP(i) based water splitting under neutral conditions, particularly focusing on the synthetic strategies and design concepts for improved catalytic performances. Challenges and outlook for further development of these promising catalysts are also discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available