4.6 Article

The Influence of a Surface Treatment of Metallic Titanium on the Photocatalytic Properties of TiO2Nanotubes Grown by Anodic Oxidation

Journal

CATALYSTS
Volume 10, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/catal10070803

Keywords

electropolishing; anodic oxidation; TiO(2)nanotubes; photocatalysis; metal titanium foil

Funding

  1. Slovenian Research Agency (ARRS) [P2-0084]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Titanium dioxide (TiO2) nanotubes obtained by the anodic oxidation of titanium metal foils can be used for the photocatalytic degradation of organic pollutants. The aim of our study was to determine the influence of the titanium foil's surface treatment on the final morphology of the TiO(2)nanotubes and their photocatalytic activity. In our experiments, we used two different titanium foils that were electropolished or untreated prior to the anodic oxidation. The morphologies of the starting titanium foils and the resulting TiO(2)nanotube layers were investigated and the photocatalytic activities measured by the decomposition of caffeine under UV irradiation. Our results showed that electropolishing of the starting foils produced a more uniform and smoother TiO(2)nanotubes surface. In contrast, the TiO(2)nanotube surfaces from untreated titanium foils mimic the initial surface roughness of the titanium foil. A comparison of the photocatalytic properties of the TiO(2)nanotube layers obtained from the untreated and electropolished titanium foils showed that electropolishing does not necessarily improve the photocatalytic properties of the resulting TiO(2)nanotube layer. It was found that the determining factors influencing the photocatalytic activity are the chemical impurities (Ti-nitride) on the surface of the titanium foils and the surface roughness of the TiO(2)nanotube layer. The highest photocatalytic activity was achieved with the anodized untreated foil with the minimal presence of Ti-nitride and a relatively high roughness of the TiO(2)nanotubes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available