4.5 Review

Androgens' effects on cerebrovascular function in health and disease

Journal

BIOLOGY OF SEX DIFFERENCES
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s13293-020-00309-4

Keywords

Androgens; Cerebral vasculature; Stroke; Vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia; Cerebrovascular disease; Testosterone; Dihydrotestosterone; Hormone therapy; Endothelial; Blood-brain barrier

Funding

  1. American Heart Association Scientist Development Grant [16SDG27190001]
  2. NINDS/NIA [R01 NS110749]
  3. Albany Medical College start-up funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Androgens affect the cerebral vasculature and may contribute to sex differences in cerebrovascular diseases. Men are at a greater risk for stroke and vascular contributions to cognitive impairment and dementia (VCID) compared to women throughout much of the lifespan. The cerebral vasculature is a target for direct androgen actions, as it expresses several sex steroid receptors and metabolizing enzymes. Androgens' actions on the cerebral vasculature are complex, as they have been shown to have both protective and detrimental effects, depending on factors such as age, dose, and disease state. When administered chronically, androgens are shown to be pro-angiogenic, promote vasoconstriction, and influence blood-brain barrier permeability. In addition to these direct effects of androgens on the cerebral vasculature, androgens also influence other vascular risk factors that may contribute to sex differences in cerebrovascular diseases. In men, low androgen levels have been linked to metabolic and cardiovascular diseases including hypertension, diabetes, hyperlipidemia, and obesity, which greatly increase the risk of stroke and VCID. Thus, a better understanding of androgens' interactions with the cerebral vasculature under physiological and pathological conditions is of key importance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available