4.3 Article

Quantifying the effect of market information on demand for genetically modified salmon

Journal

AQUACULTURE ECONOMICS & MANAGEMENT
Volume 25, Issue 1, Pages 1-26

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS INC
DOI: 10.1080/13657305.2020.1803447

Keywords

Choice experiment; consumer behavior; food labeling; genetic modification; salmon

Funding

  1. University of Rhode Island Coastal Institute

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study explores how consumer demand for seafood products is influenced by production process labels and information about GM technology. Consumers are willing to pay a premium for Non-GM and Organic fillets when not provided with GM information, while requiring a discount for Fed-GM and GM fillets. Positive information reduces willingness to pay for Organic and GM products, while negative information has the opposite effect on Organic fillets.
We investigate how production process labels and information about potential positive and/or negative aspects of GM technology affects demand for novel seafood products. We collected data during an online choice experiment distributed among 1,043 United States seafood consumers. Our results indicate participants not provided with GM information are willing to pay a premium for Verified Non-GM and Organic fillets, but require a discount for Fed-GM and GM fillets. Positive information reduces willingness to pay (WTP) for Organic, Non-GM and GM fillets, while negative information significantly increases WTP for Organic fillets and reduces WTP for GM fillets. Balanced information reduces WTP for Organic and Verified Non-GM salmon, similar in magnitude to positive information, and reduces WTP for GM-Fed and GM salmon, similar in magnitude to negative information. We provide some recommendations and discussion on how producers and food sellers might encourage effective communication between themselves and consumers based on our findings and the broader literature.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available