4.3 Article

Characteristics of the genotype and phenotype in Chinese primary hyperoxaluria type 1 populations

Journal

UROLITHIASIS
Volume 49, Issue 1, Pages 17-25

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00240-020-01201-x

Keywords

Primary hyperoxaluria type 1; AGXT; Chinese; Phenotype

Funding

  1. Beijing Municipal Administration of Hospitals Clinical Medicine Development [XMLX201826]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study revealed heterogeneity between genotype and phenotype in Chinese PH1 patients, with c.815_816insGA and c.33_34insC identified as mutation hotspot regions in China associated with poor prognosis. The race-specific mutation c.1049G>A was not determined in Pakistani patients.
The aim of our study is to explore the relationship between genotype and phenotype in Chinese PH1 patients and determine the putative mutation hotspot regions. This was a retrospective study regarding 13 Chinese PH1 patients. And all sporadic published researches of Chinese PH1 populations were searched and enrolled based on the inclusive standard. All patients presented with multiple urolithiasis or nephrolithiasis. Urinary oxalate values demonstrated an obvious and extensive variability, ranging from 1.01 to 3.85 mmol/1.73 m(2). Molecular diagnosis showed that 13 mutant types were detected. Infantile form patient (pt.) 10 and five patients (pts. 5, 7, 8, 9, 12) carrying c.815_816insGA or c.33_34insC demonstrated a worse prognosis, of whom pt. 5 progressed into ESRD 4 years later and died of chronic kidney failure. Based on the integrated Chinese mutation data, two variants (c.815_816insGA and c.33_34insC) were determined as the most common mutations. Besides, c.1049G>A was initially identified in a Chinese patient. Conclusions: heterogeneity between genotype and phenotype was observed and described in Chinese PH1 patients. c.815_816insGA and c.33_34insC which were recognized asAGXTmutation hotspot regions in China implied a poor prognosis. And c.1049G>A was not determined as the race-specific mutation of Pakistani.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available