4.8 Article

The role of anions on the Helmholtz Plane for the solid-liquid interface in aqueous rechargeable lithium batteries

Journal

NANO ENERGY
Volume 74, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.nanoen.2020.104864

Keywords

Solid-liquid interface; Helmholtz plane; LiFePO4; Aqueous rechargeable lithium batteries

Funding

  1. National Key R&D Program of China [2016YFB0700600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21603007, 51672012]
  3. Shenzhen Science and Technology Research Grant [JCYJ20160531141048950, JCYJ20150729111733470]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Li-ion transport at the electrode/electrolyte interface in lithium ion batteries (LIBs) relies on the structure of the electrical double layer. Our previous work indicates that the constructing of Janus amphiphilic coordination interface on LiFePO4 in aqueous electrolyte relieves the energy barriers of the Lithorn solvation/desolvation process. Here, aqueous electrolytes with different salts (LiNO3, LiCl, Li2SO4 and CH3COOLi) were tested in LiFePO4 single nanoparticle, and Ab initio calculations and simulation were carried out. H2O has a stronger binding energy with Fe and Li on the surface of LiFePO4 to form Janus interface, so the activation energies of Li-ion in Janus layer are the same in the four electrolytes. The simulation result confirms that the Li-ion transport at the interface have a close relationship with the anionic physical characteristics. Combing with the experimental and calculated results, it can be inferred that the activation energy (Ea) of Li-ion includes Janus interface, anion adsorption layer and cation adsorption layer. Owing to the same Janus interface and cation adsorption layer, the difference of Ea in the four kinds of electrolytes must come from the anion adsorption layer in inner Helmholtz plane (IHP). This work provides a guiding significance on development of aqueous electrolyte systems.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available