4.4 Article

The role of right-handed neutrinos in b -> c tau v<mml:mo stretchy=true><overbar></mml:mover> anomalies

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP08(2020)022

Keywords

Phenomenology of Field Theories in Higher Dimensions

Funding

  1. Spanish Government
  2. ERDF funds from the EU Commission [FPA2017-84445-P]
  3. Generalitat Valenciana [Prometeo/2017/053]
  4. La CaixaSevero Ochoa scholarship
  5. Ministerio de Ciencia, Innovacion y Universidades, Spain [FPU15/05103]
  6. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Motivated by the persistent anomalies reported in the b -> c tau v data, we perform a general model-independent analysis of these transitions, in the presence of light right-handed neutrinos. We adopt an effective field theory approach and write a low-energy effective Hamiltonian, including all possible dimension-six operators. The corresponding Wilson coefficients are determined through a numerical fit to all available experimental data. In order to work with a manageable set of free parameters, we define eleven well- motivated scenarios, characterized by the different types of new physics that could mediate these transitions, and analyse which options seem to be preferred by the current measurements. The data exhibit a clear preference for new-physics contributions, and good fits to the data are obtained in several cases. However, the current measurement of the longitudinal D polarization in B -> D tau v cannot be easily accommodated within its experimental 1 sigma range. A general analysis of the three-body B -> D tau v and four-body B -> D-> D pitau v angular distributions is also presented. The accessible angular observables are studied in order to assess their sensitivity to the different new physics scenarios. Experimental information on these distributions would help to disentangle the dynamical origin of the current anomalies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available