4.4 Article

Low-dimensional de Sitter quantum gravity

Journal

JOURNAL OF HIGH ENERGY PHYSICS
Volume -, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/JHEP06(2020)048

Keywords

Gauge-gravity correspondence; 2D Gravity; Chern-Simons Theories

Funding

  1. Fannie and John Hertz Foundation
  2. Stanford Graduate Fellowship program
  3. Department of Energy [DE-SC0013682]
  4. Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada (NSERC) [SAPIN/00032-2015]
  5. DOE [DE-SC0019380]
  6. Simons Foundation [385602]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We study aspects of Jackiw-Teitelboim (JT) quantum gravity in two-dimensional nearly de Sitter (dS) spacetime, as well as pure de Sitter quantum gravity in three dimensions. These are each theories of boundary modes, which include a reparameterization field on each connected component of the boundary as well as topological degrees of freedom. In two dimensions, the boundary theory is closely related to the Schwarzian path integral, and in three dimensions to the quantization of coadjoint orbits of the Virasoro group. Using these boundary theories we compute loop corrections to the wavefunction of the universe, and investigate gravitational contributions to scattering.Along the way, we show that JT gravity in dS(2) is an analytic continuation of JT gravity in Euclidean AdS(2), and that pure gravity in dS(3) is a continuation of pure gravity in Euclidean AdS(3). We define a genus expansion for de Sitter JT gravity by summing over higher genus generalizations of surfaces used in the Hartle-Hawking construction. Assuming a conjecture regarding the volumes of moduli spaces of such surfaces, we find that the de Sitter genus expansion is the continuation of the recently discovered AdS genus expansion. Then both may be understood as coming from the genus expansion of the same double-scaled matrix model, which would provide a non-perturbative completion of de Sitter JT gravity.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available