4.7 Article

Separation of Residential Space Cooling Usage From Smart Meter Data

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON SMART GRID
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 3107-3118

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TSG.2020.2965958

Keywords

HVAC; Hidden Markov models; Load modeling; Smart meters; Energy consumption; Data models; Temperature distribution; FHMM; disaggregation; HVAC; demand response potential; smart meter data; targeting

Funding

  1. Australia-China Science and Research Fund Joint Research Center for Energy Informatics and Demand Response Technologies
  2. Australian Research Council [DP200103494]
  3. Australian Research Council [DP200103494] Funding Source: Australian Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

For demand response (DR) programs that focus on the energy consumption of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning (HVAC), the knowledge on HVAC usage of individual customers is of great value for DR program implementation. This paper presents a novel methodology to extract space cooling usage from smart meter data. A multisequence, non-homogeneous Factorial Hidden Markov Model (MN-FHMM) is proposed to disaggregate the whole-house energy consumption into an HVAC component and a baseload (i.e., the sum of non-temperature-sensitive loads) component. Rather than holding a constant transition probability over the whole process, a time-varying transition probability model is developed to characterize the dynamic nature of the evolution of users' energy consumption. We also discuss how to use the disaggregation results to estimate the HVAC related DR potential for individual customers, which can further inform DR programs to target customers more cost-effectively. Data experiments on ground truth data validate both the accuracy and the robustness of the proposed model as well as the effectiveness of the targeting strategy based on the disaggregation results.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available