4.6 Article

Antibiotic Resistance Patterns of Pseudomonas spp. Isolated From Raw Milk Revealed by Whole Genome Sequencing

Journal

FRONTIERS IN MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 11, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.01005

Keywords

Pseudomonasspp; antibiotic resistance; whole genome sequencing; milk; multiple antibiotic resistance index

Categories

Funding

  1. Special Fund for Project of Risk Assessment on Raw Milk [GJFP2019027]
  2. Agricultural Science and Technology Innovation Program [ASTIP-IAS12]
  3. Modern Agro-Industry Technology Research System of China [CARS-36]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Psychrotrophic bacteria in raw milk are most well known for their spoilage potential and the economic losses they cause to the dairy industry. Food-related psychrotrophic bacteria are increasingly reported to have antibiotic resistance features. The aim of this study was to evaluate the resistance patterns ofPseudomonasspp. isolated from bulk-tank milk. In total, we investigated the antibiotic susceptibility profiles of 86Pseudomonasspp. isolates from raw milk. All strains were tested against 15 antimicrobial agents.Pseudomonasisolates were most highly resistant to imipenem (95.3%), followed by trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (69.8%), aztreonam (60.5%), chloramphenicol (45.3%), and meropenem (27.9%). Their multiple antibiotic resistance (MAR) index values ranged from 0.0 to 0.8. Whole-genome sequencing revealed the presence of intrinsic resistance determinants, such as BcI,ampC-09,blaCTX-M,oprD,sul1,dfrE,catA1,catB3,catI,floR, andcmlV. Moreover, resistance-nodulation-cell division (RND) and ATP-binding cassette (ABC) antibiotic efflux pumps were also found. This study provides further knowledge of the antibiotic resistance patterns ofPseudomonasspp. in milk, which may advance our understanding of resistance inPseudomonasand suggests that antibiotic resistance ofPseudomonasspp. in raw milk should be a concern.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available