4.8 Article

A survey-based analysis of the academic job market

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.54097

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. University of North Dakota Start-up funds
  2. National Institute of General Medical Sciences [F32GM125388]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [T32HL007749]
  4. Midwestern University Start-up funds
  5. Washington Research Foundation Fund for Innovation in Data-Intensive Discovery
  6. University of Washington Moore-Sloan Data Science Environments Project
  7. Washington University in St. Louis Start-up funds

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Many postdoctoral researchers apply for faculty positions knowing relatively little about the hiring process or what is needed to secure a job offer. To address this lack of knowledge about the hiring process we conducted a survey of applicants for faculty positions: the survey ran between May 2018 and May 2019, and received 317 responses. We analyzed the responses to explore the interplay between various scholarly metrics and hiring outcomes. We concluded that, above a certain threshold, the benchmarks traditionally used to measure research success - including funding, number of publications or journals published in - were unable to completely differentiate applicants with and without job offers. Respondents also reported that the hiring process was unnecessarily stressful, time-consuming, and lacking in feedback, irrespective of outcome. Our findings suggest that there is considerable scope to improve the transparency of the hiring process.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available