4.8 Article

FMRP promotes RNA localization to neuronal projections through interactions between its RGG domain and G-quadruplex RNA sequences

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.52621

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Boettcher Foundation [AWD182937]
  2. National Institutes of Health [NIH1R35GM133885, NIHDK120444, NIHAI140044, NIHDK118803-01A1, NIH1R01MH109026, 1U54HD082013, NIH-T32-GM008730]
  3. Guild ACORN
  4. Colorado Clinical and Translational Sciences Institute
  5. Children's Diabetes Foundation
  6. NIH NIH/HIRN consortium new investigator award
  7. Culshaw Junior Investigator Award
  8. Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
  9. Human Islet Research Network NIH/HIRN consortium new investigator award
  10. University of Colorado RNA Bioscience Initiative

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The sorting of RNA molecules to subcellular locations facilitates the activity of spatially restricted processes. We have analyzed subcellular transcriptomes of FMRP-null mouse neuronal cells to identify transcripts that depend on FMRP for efficient transport to neurites. We found that these transcripts contain an enrichment of G-quadruplex sequences in their 3' UTRs, suggesting that FMRP recognizes them to promote RNA localization. We observed similar results in neurons derived from Fragile X Syndrome patients. We identified the RGG domain of FMRP as important for binding G-quadruplexes and the transport of G-quadruplex-containing transcripts. Finally, we found that the translation and localization targets of FMRP were distinct and that an FMRP mutant that is unable to bind ribosomes still promoted localization of G-quadruplex-containing messages. This suggests that these two regulatory modes of FMRP may be functionally separated. These results provide a framework for the elucidation of similar mechanisms governed by other RNA-binding proteins.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available