4.8 Article

Interaction mapping of endoplasmic reticulum ubiquitin ligases identifies modulators of innate immune signalling

Journal

ELIFE
Volume 9, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELIFE SCIENCES PUBLICATIONS LTD
DOI: 10.7554/eLife.57306

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/N034295/1]
  2. Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences [2018-I2M-2-002]
  3. Medical Research Council [MR/L001209/1]
  4. Wellcome [102894/Z/13/Z]
  5. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  6. EPSRC [EP/N034295/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  7. MRC [MR/L001209/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. Wellcome Trust [102894/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ubiquitin ligases (E3s) embedded in the endoplasmic reticulum (ER) membrane regulate essential cellular activities including protein quality control, calcium flux, and sterol homeostasis. At least 25 different, transmembrane domain (TMD)-containing E3s are predicted to be ER-localised, but for most their organisation and cellular roles remain poorly defined. Using a comparative proteomic workflow, we mapped over 450 protein-protein interactions for 21 stably expressed, full-length E3s. Bioinformatic analysis linked ER-E3s and their interactors to multiple homeostatic, regulatory, and metabolic pathways. Among these were four membrane-embedded interactors of RNF26, a polytopic E3 whose abundance is auto-regulated by ubiquitin-proteasome dependent degradation. RNF26 co-assembles with TMEM43, ENDOD1, TMEM33 and TMED1 to form a complex capable of modulating innate immune signalling through the cGAS-STING pathway. This RNF26 complex represents a new modulatory axis of STING and innate immune signalling at the ER membrane. Collectively, these data reveal the broad scope of regulation and differential functionalities mediated by ER-E3s for both membrane-tethered and cytoplasmic processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available