4.4 Article

Dynamic changes of Chest CT follow-up in Coronavirus Disease-19 (COVID-19) pneumonia: relationship to clinical typing

Journal

BMC MEDICAL IMAGING
Volume 20, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

BMC
DOI: 10.1186/s12880-020-00491-2

Keywords

COVID-19; Coronavirus infections; Pneumonia; CT; Follow-up studies

Funding

  1. Bureau of Science & Technology and Intellectual Property Nanchong City [19SXHZ0429]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background To investigate the CT changes of different clinical types of COVID-19 pneumonia. Methods This retrospective study included 50 patients with COVID-19 from 16 January 2020 to 25 February 2020. We analyzed the clinical characteristics, CT characteristics and the pneumonia involvement of the patients between the moderate group and the severe and critical group, and the dynamic changes of severity with the CT follow-up time. Results There were differences in the CT severity score of the right lung in the initial CT, and total CT severity score in the initial and follow-up CT between the moderate group and the severe and critical group (allp < 0.05). There was a quadratic relationship between total CT severity score and CT follow-up time in the severe and critical group (r(2) = 0.137,p = 0.008), the total CT severity score peaked at the second follow-up CT. There was no correlation between total CT severity score and CT follow-up time in the moderate group (p > 0.05). There were no differences in the occurrence rate of CT characteristics in the initial CT between the two groups (allp > 0.05). There were differences in the occurrence rate of ground-glass opacity and crazy-paving pattern in the second follow-up CT, and pleural thickening or adhesion in the third follow-up CT between the two groups (allp < 0.05). Conclusions The CT changes of COVID-19 pneumonia with different severity were different, and the extent of pneumonia involvement by CT can help to assess the severity of COVID-19 pneumonia rather than the initial CT characteristics.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available