4.5 Article

Accurate, Low Cost PM2.5Measurements Demonstrate the Large Spatial Variation in Wood Smoke Pollution in Regional Australia and Improve Modeling and Estimates of Health Costs

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos11080856

Keywords

wood smoke; low cost sensors; calibration; health costs; spatial variability; PM25

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The accuracy and utility of low-cost PM(2.5)sensors was evaluated for measuring spatial variation and modeling population exposure to PM(2.5)pollution from domestic wood-heating (DWH) in Armidale, a regional town in New South Wales (NSW), Australia, to obtain estimates of health costs and mortality. Eleven 'PurpleAir' (PA) monitors were deployed, including five located part of the time at the NSW government station (NSWGov) to derive calibration equations. Calibrated PA PM(2.5)were almost identical to the NSWGov tapered element oscillating microbalance (TEOM) and Armidale Regional Council's 2017 DustTrak measurements. Spatial variation was substantial. National air quality standards were exceeded 32 times from May-August 2018 at NSWGov and 63 times in one residential area. Wood heater use by about 50% of households increased estimated annual PM(2.5)exposure by over eight micrograms per cubic meter, suggesting increased mortality of about 10% and health costs of thousands of dollars per wood heater per year. Accurate real-time community-based monitoring can improve estimates of exposure and avoid bias in estimating dose-response relationships. Efforts over the past decade to reduce wood smoke pollution proved ineffective, perhaps partly because some residents do not understand the health impacts or costs of wood-heating. Real-time Internet displays can increase awareness of DWH and bushfire pollution and encourage governments to develop effective policies to protect public health, as recommended by several recent studies in which wood smoke was identified as a major source of health-hazardous air pollution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available