4.5 Article

End of the Day (EOD) Judgment for Daily Rain-Gauge Data

Journal

ATMOSPHERE
Volume 11, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/atmos11080772

Keywords

APHRODITE; precipitation; accumulation period; GSOD; CMORPH; ERA-Interim

Funding

  1. Environment Research and Technology Development Fund of the Environmental Restoration and Conservation Agency (ERCA), Japan [2-1602]
  2. Hirosaki University Institutional Fund, Bilateral programs with Turkey by Japan Society for Promotion of Science (JSPS)
  3. Japan Science and Technology Agency (JST)
  4. Sakura Science program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Several versions of Asian Precipitation-Highly-Resolved Observational Data Integration Towards Evaluation of Extreme Events (APHRODITE-2) have been released for analyzing rain-gauge-based daily precipitation. APHRODITE-2 constitutes an improvement compared with the previous versions for evaluating extreme precipitation. One advantage of APHRODITE-2 products (versions 1801R1 and 1901) over APHRODITE-1 products is the ability to ensure uniformity in the daily accumulation period (end of the day, EOD) used in a specific domain. To create these EOD segregated or EOD adjusted products, we applied an EOD judgment scheme using multi-satellite merged precipitation products CMORPH V1.0 and ERA-Interim reanalysis. The novelty of the current methodology was tested against rain-gauge datasets with known EOD information. Despite the difference in horizontal resolution, ERA-Interim shows similar EOD detection performance to CMORPH. However, CMORPH showed better performance over India than ERA-Interim. The current method has potential to judge EOD of rain-gauge station data with an unknown observation time. Having prior EOD information as metadata is very important for gridded datasets as well as station data. Here, we also present deterministic/estimated EOD that we used for V1801R1 over Monsoon Asia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available