4.6 Article

Biomimetic Electrodes for Flexible Organic Solar Cells with Efficiencies over 16%

Journal

ADVANCED OPTICAL MATERIALS
Volume 8, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY-V C H VERLAG GMBH
DOI: 10.1002/adom.202000669

Keywords

colorless polyimide; flexible electrodes; light manipulation; organic solar cells; polystyrene spheres

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [91633301, 61520106012, 61905171, 61722404, 51873138]
  2. Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province of China [BK20190815]
  3. 333 Program [BRA2019061]
  4. Collaborative Innovation Center of Suzhou Nano Science and Technology
  5. Office of Naval Research [N00014-17-1-2201, N00014-14-1-0246, N00014-17-1-2260]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Flexible organic solar cells (OSCs) are very promising for use in portable power supply devices due to the advantages of low-cost, light-weight, and flexibility. However, the efficiencies of flexible OSCs are limited by the flexible transparent electrodes owing to their nonoptimal electrical, optical, and mechanical properties. To address these challenges, leaf-like biomimetic electrodes are proposed to achieve an efficient light capture and glossy surface for a high-efficiency flexible OSC. To mimic the internal anatomy of the leaf, the conformable electrode stack consists of a flexible polyimide substrate, light-scattering polystyrene spheres, zinc oxide protecting layer, and electrically conductive silver nanowires to obtain a high transmittance, low sheet resistance, and low surface roughness. A record-high power conversion efficiency of 16.1% is realized by a flexible OSC with the biomimetic electrode design, comparable to those rigid devices on glass. Moreover, the flexible OSC on this biomimetic electrode exhibits a robust bendability against flexural strain, retaining 85% of the initial efficiency after 5000 bending cycles at a radius of curvature as small as 1.0 mm.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available