4.6 Article

Influence of Water Stress Levels on the Yield and Lycopene Content of Tomato

Journal

WATER
Volume 12, Issue 8, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12082165

Keywords

cis-lycopene; all-trans-lycopene; WUE; irrigation; deficit irrigation; smart irrigation; CWSI; infrared thermography

Funding

  1. GINOP [2.2.1-15-2016-00003]
  2. Higher Education Institutional Excellence Program [NKFIH-1159-6/2019]
  3. Ministry for Innovation and Technology within the framework of water-related research of Szent Istvan University [EFOP-3.6.3-VEKOP-16-2017-00008]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Good water supply practice provides benefits such as water and energy conservation but also alters the quality of yield. These effects of irrigation on yield quantity and quality are widely researched in the case of many plants. In tomato it can affect the soluble solids content positively together with a slight reduction in yield quantity as confirmed by many studies. There are results in the literature regarding its effect on carotenoid composition and lycopene content as well, but the effect on lycopene isomers has not been revealed yet. In this study, we investigated how different water supply levels affect yield quantity and quality, focusing on lycopene components. A two-year open field irrigation experiment with a center pivot capable of variable rate irrigation was conducted on processing tomato. The water supply levels were 100%, 75%, and 50% of ETc (crop evapotranspiration) until the beginning of the ripening stage, calculated by AquaCrop compared to control without regular irrigation. The results suggested that 75% of ETc supplied till the beginning of ripening, was a balanced water supply level regarding yield quantity, soluble solids content and lycopene concentration and yields, such as higher concentration and ratio to total carotenoids. The evaluation of cis-lycopene concentration and ratio to all-trans did not show clear results in the two years.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available