4.6 Article

Energy Dissipation and Hydraulics of Flow over Trapezoidal-Triangular Labyrinth Weirs

Journal

WATER
Volume 12, Issue 7, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12071992

Keywords

TTLW labyrinth weir; discharge coefficient; energy dissipation; subcritical flow; FLOW-3D

Funding

  1. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research under PRIN grant [20154EHYW9]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work experimental and numerical investigations were carried out to study the influence of the geometric parameters of trapezoidal-triangular labyrinth weirs (TTLW) on the discharge coefficient, energy dissipation, and downstream flow regime, considering two different orientations in labyrinth weir position respective to the reservoir discharge channel. To simulate the free flow surface, the volume of fluid (VOF) method, and the Renormalization Group (RNG)k-epsilon model turbulence were adopted in the FLOW-3D software. The flow over the labyrinth weir (in both orientations) is simulated as a steady-state flow, and the discharge coefficient is validated with experimental data. The results highlighted that the numerical model shows proper coordination with experimental results and also the discharge coefficient decreases by decreasing the sidewall angle due to the collision of the falling jets for the high value of H/P (H: the hydraulic head, P: the weir height). Hydraulics of flow over TTLW has free flow conditions in low discharge and submerged flow conditions in high discharge. TTLW approximately dissipates the maximum amount of energy due to the collision of nappes in the upstream apexes and to the circulating flow in the pool generated behind the nappes; moreover, an increase in sidewall angle and weir height leads to reduced energy. The energy dissipation of TTLW is largest compared to vertical drop and has the least possible value of residual energy as flow increases.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available