4.6 Article

Quality of Dissolved Organic Matter Driven by Autotrophic and Heterotrophic Microbial Processes in a Large River

Journal

WATER
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/w12061577

Keywords

dissolved organic matter (DOM); fourier transform-ion cyclotron resonance mass spectroscopy (FT-ICR MS); phytoplankton; bacteria; bacterial production

Funding

  1. Helmholtz Association in the framework of Modular Observation Solutions for Earth Systems (MOSES)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Rivers are regarded as important sites for processing of dissolved organic matter (DOM) from terrestrial sources on its way to the ocean. However, little is known about the longitudinal change of DOM molecular composition in large rivers. Here we performed a Lagrangian sampling in the lower part of the Middle Elbe at low discharge conditions to test how DOM composition changes along the river stretch and how this is related to microbial processes. The concentration of dissolved organic carbon and fluorescence indices showed only subtle longitudinal differences. In contrast, ultra-high-resolution mass spectrometry analysis of riverine DOM detected pronounced changes in molecular composition. Also, chlorophyll a concentration, bacterial abundance, and bacterial production all increased downstream. The three microbial parameters were positively related to intensities of CHO and CHNO molecular formulas with high hydrogen/carbon and low oxygen/carbon ratios but negatively to several CHOS surfactants. To disentangle the role of autotrophic and heterotrophic processes, we developed a new approach and compared slopes from linear regression of DOM compound intensities versus chlorophyll a concentration and bacteria abundance. As a result, most of the positive related DOM compounds were produced by bacteria. In conclusion, longitudinal changes of river DOM seemed to be largely driven by microbial processes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available