4.7 Article

Gustatory Function and the Uremic Toxin, Phosphate, Are Modulators of the Risk of Vascular Calcification among Patients with Chronic Kidney Disease: A Pilot Study

Journal

TOXINS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/toxins12060420

Keywords

aortic calcification; chronic kidney disease; gustation; nutrition; taste dysfunction; vascular calcification

Funding

  1. National Taiwan University Hospital Beihu Branch
  2. Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan [MOST 108-2314-B-002-055-]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD) have an increased risk of vascular calcification (VC), including aortic arch calcification (AAC). Few investigated the influence of gustatory function on the probability of having VC. We examined whether gustatory function results modulated the probability of having VC in patients with CKD. We prospectively enrolled adults with CKD (estimated glomerular filtration rate <60 mL/min/1.73 m(2)), with their AAC rated semi-quantitatively and gustatory function assessed by objective and subjective approaches. Multiple logistic regression was used to analyze the relationship between gustatory function results and AAC. Those with AAC had significantly better objective gustatory function in aggregate scores (p= 0.039) and categories (p= 0.022) and less defective bitter taste (p= 0.045) and scores (p= 0.037) than those without. Multiple regression analyses showed that higher aggregate scores (odds ratio (OR) 1.288,p= 0.032), or better gustatory function, and higher bitter taste scores (OR 2.558,p= 0.019) were each associated with a higher probability of having AAC among CKD patients; such an association was modulated by serum phosphate levels. In conclusion, better gustatory function was independently correlated with having AAC among CKD patients. A follow-up of VC severity may be an underrecognized component of care for CKD patients with a preserved gustatory function.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available