4.6 Article

Paradoxical activation of AMPK by glucose drives selective EP300 activity in colorectal cancer

Journal

PLOS BIOLOGY
Volume 18, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

PUBLIC LIBRARY SCIENCE
DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000732

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Spanish government [AEI,Mineco/FEDER SAF2016-79837-R, PID2019-110998RB-100, MICIU/FEDER: RTI2018-099343-B-100]
  2. European Union [PIEF-GA-2013-626098]
  3. EMBO Postdoctoral Long-Term Fellowship [ALTF 800-2013]
  4. Comunidad de Madrid: Ayudas Atraccion de Talento [2017-T1/BMD-5334]
  5. Comunidad de Madrid [FEDER-PEJD-2017-POST/BMD-3906]
  6. Ludwig Institute for Cancer Research
  7. INSERM
  8. CNRS
  9. Universite Paris Descartes
  10. SFD (Societe Francophone du Diabete)
  11. Region Ile-deFrance

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Coordination of gene expression with nutrient availability supports proliferation and homeostasis and is shaped by protein acetylation. Yet how physiological/pathological signals link acetylation to specific gene expression programs and whether such responses are cell-type-specific is unclear. AMP-activated protein kinase (AMPK) is a key energy sensor, activated by glucose limitation to resolve nutrient supply-demand imbalances, critical for diabetes and cancer. Unexpectedly, we show here that, in gastrointestinal cancer cells, glucose activates AMPK to selectively induce EP300, but not CREB-binding protein (CBP). Consequently, EP300 is redirected away from nuclear receptors that promote differentiation towards beta-catenin, a driver of proliferation and colorectal tumorigenesis. Importantly, blocking glycogen synthesis permits reactive oxygen species (ROS) accumulation and AMPK activation in response to glucose in previously nonresponsive cells. Notably, glycogen content and activity of the ROS/AMPK/EP300/beta-catenin axis are opposite in healthy versus tumor sections. Glycogen content reduction from healthy to tumor tissue may explain AMPK switching from tumor suppressor to activator during tumor evolution.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available