4.7 Article

Reliability research on the 5-cm-thick insulation layer used in the Yuximolegai tunnel based on a physical model test

Journal

COLD REGIONS SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY
Volume 124, Issue -, Pages 54-66

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
DOI: 10.1016/j.coldregions.2016.01.001

Keywords

Temperature field; Frost heave force; Model test; Insulation layer; Cold-region tunnel

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation project of China [51508314, 51174196]
  2. Scientific Research Foundation of Shandong University of Science and Technology for Recruited Talents [2015RCJJ061]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Yuximolegai tunnel was built in the Tianshan mountain of Xinjiang. A 5-cm-thick insulation layer designed by engineering analogy was laid to project the surrounding rocks. To investigate the reliability of the design, a model test, primarily including a refrigeration system, a circulation system and a temperature control system, was developed. Two tests were designed and conducted: (1) a tunnel without insulation layer is studied using the freezing test; (2) a tunnel with a 5-cm-thick insulation layer is studied using the same test. The results show that the 5-cm-thick insulation layer employed in the field can only stop 86.5% of the lowest temperature to transfer to the surrounding rocks on average. On the basis of the analysis for the temperature law from in situ monitoring results and the model test results, the freezing depth is approximately 1.5-2 m away from the lining. When the 5-cm-thick insulation layer is laid, the freezing depth still reaches 0.5 m, which indicates that the preservation measure cannot fully protect the rocks surrounding the tunnel against freezing damage. In addition, comparing the frost heave force from the model test is found to have good consistency with the in situ test. The results obtained can serve as a guide for the design and the numerical simulation research of cold-region tunnels. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available