4.7 Review

Recent Developments of Biomaterials for Additive Manufacturing of Bone Scaffolds

Journal

ADVANCED HEALTHCARE MATERIALS
Volume 9, Issue 23, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/adhm.202000724

Keywords

3D printing; additive manufacturing; bone implants; regenerative biomaterials; tissue engineering

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51773231, 81971760, 81801845]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2018YFB1105700]
  3. Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province [2014A030312018]
  4. Science and Technology Planning Project of Guangdong Province [2015B010125004]
  5. Project of Key Laboratory of Sensing Technology and Biomedical Instruments of Guangdong Province [2011A060901013]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Recent years have witnessed surging demand for bone repair/regeneration implants due to the increasing number of bone defects caused by trauma, cancer, infection, and arthritis worldwide. In addition to bone autografts and allografts, biomaterial substitutes have been widely used in clinical practice. Personalized implants with precise and personalized control of shape, porosity, composition, surface chemistry, and mechanical properties will greatly facilitate the regeneration of bone tissue and satiate the clinical needs. Additive manufacturing (AM) techniques, also known as 3D printing, are drawing fast growing attention in the fabrication of implants or scaffolding materials due to their capability of manufacturing complex and irregularly shaped scaffolds in repairing bone defects in clinical practice. This review aims to provide a comprehensive overview of recent progress in the development of materials and techniques used in the additive manufacturing of bone scaffolds. In addition, clinical application, pre-clinical trials and future prospects of AM based bone implants are also summarized and discussed.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available