4.7 Article

Impact of strain, pressure, and electron correlation on magnetism and crystal structure of Mn2GaC from first-principles

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-68377-5

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Swedish Foundation for Strategic Research (SSF) [EM16-0004]
  2. Knut and Alice Wallenberg (KAW) Foundation [KAW 2015.0043]
  3. Swedish Research council [642-2013-8020]
  4. Linkoping University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The atomically laminated Mn2GaC has previously been synthesized as a heteroepitaxial thin film and found to be magnetic with structural changes linked to the magnetic anisotropy. Related theoretical studies only considered bulk conditions and thus neglected the influence from possible strain linked to the choice of substrate. Here we employ first principles calculations considering different exchange-correlation functionals (PBE, PW91, PBEsol, AM05, LDA) and effect from use of+U methods (or not) combined with a magnetic ground-state search using Heisenberg Monte Carlo simulations, to study influence from biaxial in-plane strain and external pressure on the magnetic and crystal structure of Mn2GaC. We find that PBE and PBE+U, with U-eff <= 0.25 eV, gives both structural and magnetic properties in quantitative agreement with available experimental data. Our results also indicate that strain related to choice of substrate or applied pressure is a route for accessing different spin configurations, including a ferromagnetic state. Moreover, the easy axis is parallel to the atomic planes and the magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy can be increased through strain engineering by expanding the in-plane lattice parameter a. Altogether, we show that a quantitative description of the structural and magnetic properties of Mn2GaC is possible using PBE, which opens the way for further computational studies of these and related materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available