4.7 Article

Cardioprotective effect of succinate dehydrogenase inhibition in rat hearts and human myocardium with and without diabetes mellitus

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE RESEARCH
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-67247-4

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Kirsten Antonius foundation
  2. Aarhus University
  3. Novo Nordisk foundation
  4. AP Moller foundation
  5. The Danish Council for Independent Research [11-108354]
  6. Danish Council for Strategic Research [11-115818]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ischemia reperfusion (IR) injury may be attenuated through succinate dehydrogenase (SDH) inhibition by dimethyl malonate (DiMAL). Whether SDH inhibition yields protection in diabetic individuals and translates into human cardiac tissue remain unknown. In isolated perfused hearts from 24 weeks old male Zucker diabetic fatty (ZDF) and age matched non-diabetic control rats and atrial trabeculae from patients with and without diabetes, we compared infarct size, contractile force recovery and mitochondrial function. The cardioprotective effect of a 10minutes DiMAL administration prior to global ischemia and ischemic preconditioning (IPC) was evaluated. In non-diabetic hearts exposed to IR, DiMAL 0.1mM reduced infarct size compared to IR (55 +/- 7% vs. 69 +/- 6%, p<0.05). Mitochondrial respiration was reduced by DiMAL 0.6mM compared to sham and DiMAL 0.1mM (p<0.05). In diabetic hearts an increased concentration of DiMAL (0.6mM) was required for protection compared to IR (64 +/- 13% vs. 79 +/- 8%, p<0.05). Mitochondrial function remained unchanged. In trabeculae from humans without diabetes, IPC and DiMAL improved contractile force recovery compared to IR (43 +/- 12% and 43 +/- 13% vs. 23 +/- 13%, p<0.05) but in patients with diabetes only IPC provided protection compared to IR (51 +/- 15% vs. 21 +/- 8%, p<0.05). Neither IPC nor DiMAL modulated mitochondrial respiration in patients. Cardioprotection by SDH inhibition is possible in human tissue, but depends on diabetes status. The narrow therapeutic range and discrepancy in respiration between experimental and human studies may limit clinical translation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available