4.7 Article

Differential Effects of Antiepileptic Drugs on Focal Seizures in the Intrahippocampal Kainate Mouse Model of Mesial Temporal Lobe Epilepsy

Journal

CNS NEUROSCIENCE & THERAPEUTICS
Volume 22, Issue 6, Pages 497-506

Publisher

WILEY-BLACKWELL
DOI: 10.1111/cns.12523

Keywords

Animal model; EEG; Fast Fourier transform; Focal paroxysmal discharge; Hippocampus; Quantitative EEG

Funding

  1. Ligue Francaise Contre l'Epilepsie (bourse LFCE/Pfizer)
  2. La Metro
  3. FEDER
  4. Region Rhone-Alpes (project FUI)
  5. INSERM
  6. Pfizer

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims: Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy (MTLE) is the most common form of drug-refractory epilepsy. Most of the morphological and electrophysiological features of human MTLE can be reproduced in a mouse by a unilateral intrahippocampal injection of kainate (MTLE mouse model). The effects of antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) on the occurrence of recurrent focal hippocampal seizures in this model remain to be specified. Here, we addressed the pharmacological reactivity of this model to the most commonly used AEDs. Methods: Using depth electroencephalographical (EEG) recordings, we tested the dose-response effects of acute injection of nine AEDs on the occurrence of hippocampal paroxysmal discharges (HPDs) as well as on ictal and interictal power spectra in the MTLE mouse model. Results: Valproate, carbamazepine, and lamotrigine dose dependently suppressed HPDs and modified the general behavior and/or EEG activity. Levetiracetam and pregabalin suppressed HPDs at high doses but without any behavioral nor interictal EEG changes. Finally, phenobarbital, tiagabine, vigabatrin, and diazepam suppressed HPDs in a dose-dependent manner at doses devoid of obvious behavioral effects. Conclusion: The MTLE mouse model displays a differential sensitivity to AEDs with a greater efficacy of drug that facilitates GABAergic transmission. This model provides an efficient tool to identify new treatment for drug-resistant forms of focal epilepsies.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available