4.7 Article

Short-term memory advantage for brief durations in human APOE ε4 carriers

Journal

SCIENTIFIC REPORTS
Volume 10, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-66114-6

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [104571/Z/14/Z, 098282/Z/12/Z, 203130/Z/16/Z]
  2. British Academy
  3. National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) based at Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
  4. NIHR Oxford Health Biomedical Research Centre
  5. Wellcome Trust [098282/Z/12/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust
  6. MRC [MR/P00878X/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Apolipoprotein-E (APOE) epsilon 4 gene allele, the highest known genetic risk factor for Alzheimer's disease, has paradoxically been well preserved in the human population. One possible explanation offered by evolutionary biology for survival of deleterious genes is antagonistic pleiotropy. This theory proposes that such genetic variants might confer an advantage, even earlier in life when humans are also reproductively fit. The results of some small-cohort studies have raised the possibility of such a pleiotropic effect for the epsilon 4 allele in short-term memory (STM) but the findings have been inconsistent. Here, we tested STM performance in a large cohort of individuals (N=1277); nine hundred and fifty-nine of which included carrier and non-carriers of the APOE epsilon 4 gene, those at highest risk of developing Alzheimer's disease. We first confirm that this task is sensitive to subtle deterioration in memory performance across ageing. Importantly, individuals carrying the APOE epsilon 4 gene actually exhibited a significant memory advantage across all ages, specifically for brief retention periods but crucially not for longer durations. Together, these findings present the strongest evidence to date for a gene having an antagonistic pleiotropy effect on human cognitive function across a wide age range, and hence provide an explanation for the survival of the APOE epsilon 4 allele in the gene pool.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available