4.7 Article

In High-Risk Infants with Sufficient Vitamin D Status at Birth, Infant Vitamin D Supplementation Had No Effect on Allergy Outcomes: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Journal

NUTRIENTS
Volume 12, Issue 6, Pages -

Publisher

MDPI
DOI: 10.3390/nu12061747

Keywords

allergen sensitization; allergic disease; eczema; hereditary risk; infant; prevention; randomized controlled trial; vitamin D; wheeze

Funding

  1. Medical Research Future Fund Next Generation Clinical Researchers Program [APP1144544]
  2. Telethon-New Children's Hospital Research Fund
  3. Asthma Foundation of Western Australia
  4. Princess Margaret Hospital Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Lower vitamin D status at birth and during infancy has been associated with increased incidence of eczema and food allergies. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of early infancy vitamin D supplementation on allergic disease outcomes in infants at hereditary risk of allergic disease, but who had sufficient vitamin D levels at birth. Here, we report the early childhood follow-up to 2.5 years of age of high-risk infants who participated in a double-blinded, randomized controlled trial. For inclusion in this trial, late gestation (36-40 weeks) maternal 25-hydroxyvitamin D levels needed to be >= 50 nmol/L. Infants were randomized to either oral vitamin D supplementation of 400 IU/day (n= 97) or a placebo (n= 98) for the first six months of life. Vitamin D levels and allergic disease outcomes were followed up. There were no statistically significant differences in incidence of any medically diagnosed allergic disease outcomes or allergen sensitization rates between the vitamin D-supplemented and placebo groups at either 1 year or at 2.5 years of age. In conclusion, for allergy high-risk infants who had sufficient vitamin D status at birth, early infancy oral vitamin D supplementation does not appear to reduce the development of early childhood allergic disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available