4.8 Article

Expanding the Chemical Space of Synthetic Cyclic Peptides Using a Promiscuous Macrocyclase from Prenylagaramide Biosynthesis

Journal

ACS CATALYSIS
Volume 10, Issue 13, Pages 7146-7153

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acscatal.0c00623

Keywords

ribosomally synthesized and post-translationally modified peptides; RiPPs; post-translational modification; enzymatic synthesis; peptide library; natural products

Funding

  1. NIH [GM122521]
  2. Skaggs Graduate Research Fellowship

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Cyclic peptides are ubiquitous drug candidates, placing macrocyclization reactions at the apex of drug development. PatG and related dual-action proteases from cyanobactin biosynthesis are responsible for cleaving off the C-terminal recognition sequence and macrocyclizing the substrate to provide cyclic peptides. This reaction has found use in the enzymatic synthesis of diverse macrocycles. However, these enzymes function best on substrates that terminate with the nonproteinogenic thiazole/thiazoline residue, complicating synthetic strategies. Here, we biochemically characterize an additional class of PatG-like macrocyclases that natively use proline, obviating the necessity of additional chemical or biochemical steps. We experimentally define the biochemical steps involved in synthesizing the widespread prenylagaramide-like natural products, including macrocyclization and prenylation. Using saturation mutagenesis, we show that macrocyclase PagG and prenyltransferase PagF are highly promiscuous, producing a library of more than 100 cyclic peptides and their prenylated derivatives in vitro. By comparing our results to known cyanobactin macrocyclases, we catalog a series of enzymes from this family that should synthesize most small macrocycles. Collectively, these data reveal that, by selecting the right cyanobactin macrocyclase, a large array of enzymatically synthesized macrocycles are accessible.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available