4.8 Article

Spt6 is a maintenance factor for centromeric CENP-A

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16695-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [FWF W011-B18 DK, P31377-B30]
  2. Wellcome Senior Research Fellowship
  3. Instituto Gulbenkian de Ciencia [ERC-2013-CoG-615638]
  4. ERCconsolidator grant [ERC-2013-CoG-615638]
  5. European Research Council StartingConsolidator Grant [311674-BioSynCEN]
  6. Wellcome Trust [103897/Z/14/Z, 092076, 203149]
  7. Multi-User Equipment grant [101527/Z/13/Z]
  8. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [P31377] Funding Source: Austrian Science Fund (FWF)
  9. Wellcome Trust [103897/Z/14/Z, 101527/Z/13/Z] Funding Source: Wellcome Trust

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Replication and transcription of genomic DNA requires partial disassembly of nucleosomes to allow progression of polymerases. This presents both an opportunity to remodel the underlying chromatin and a danger of losing epigenetic information. Centromeric transcription is required for stable incorporation of the centromere-specific histone dCENP-A in M/G1 phase, which depends on the eviction of previously deposited H3/H3.3-placeholder nucleosomes. Here we demonstrate that the histone chaperone and transcription elongation factor Spt6 spatially and temporarily coincides with centromeric transcription and prevents the loss of old CENP-A nucleosomes in both Drosophila and human cells. Spt6 binds directly to dCENP-A and dCENP-A mutants carrying phosphomimetic residues alleviate this association. Retention of phosphomimetic dCENP-A mutants is reduced relative to wildtype, while non-phosphorylatable dCENP-A retention is increased and accumulates at the centromere. We conclude that Spt6 acts as a conserved CENP-A maintenance factor that ensures long-term stability of epigenetic centromere identity during transcription-mediated chromatin remodeling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available