4.8 Article

Copper bioavailability is a KRAS-specific vulnerability in colorectal cancer

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17549-y

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Canadian Government through Genome Canada
  2. National Institutes of Health [R01GM067169, R35GM136404]
  3. Cole Foundation
  4. FRQS
  5. Fonds de la recherche du Quebec-Nature and Technologies (FRQNT)
  6. Canadian Institutes for Health Research [MOP-142374, PJT-152995]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Despite its importance in human cancers, including colorectal cancers (CRC), oncogenic KRAS has been extremely challenging to target therapeutically. To identify potential vulnerabilities in KRAS-mutated CRC, we characterize the impact of oncogenic KRAS on the cell surface of intestinal epithelial cells. Here we show that oncogenic KRAS alters the expression of a myriad of cell-surface proteins implicated in diverse biological functions, and identify many potential surface-accessible therapeutic targets. Cell surface-based loss-of-function screens reveal that ATP7A, a copper-exporter upregulated by mutant KRAS, is essential for neoplastic growth. ATP7A is upregulated at the surface of KRAS-mutated CRC, and protects cells from excess copper-ion toxicity. We find that KRAS-mutated cells acquire copper via a non-canonical mechanism involving macropinocytosis, which appears to be required to support their growth. Together, these results indicate that copper bioavailability is a KRAS-selective vulnerability that could be exploited for the treatment of KRAS-mutated neoplasms. The oncogene KRAS is frequently mutated in cancer, including colorectal cancer. Here, using a cell-surface proteomics approach, KRAS-mutated colorectal cancer cells are shown to express high levels of the copper transporter ATP7A, which has an essential roles in cancer cell survival and proliferation.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available