4.8 Article

Machine learning accurate exchange and correlation functionals of the electronic density

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17265-7

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Basic Energy Sciences [DE-SC0001137, DE-SC0019394]
  2. Molecular Sciences Software Institute under NSF [ACI-1547580]
  3. National Science Foundation [1531492]
  4. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0001137] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Density functional theory (DFT) is the standard formalism to study the electronic structure of matter at the atomic scale. In Kohn-Sham DFT simulations, the balance between accuracy and computational cost depends on the choice of exchange and correlation functional, which only exists in approximate form. Here, we propose a framework to create density functionals using supervised machine learning, termed NeuralXC. These machine-learned functionals are designed to lift the accuracy of baseline functionals towards that provided by more accurate methods while maintaining their efficiency. We show that the functionals learn a meaningful representation of the physical information contained in the training data, making them transferable across systems. A NeuralXC functional optimized for water outperforms other methods characterizing bond breaking and excels when comparing against experimental results. This work demonstrates that NeuralXC is a first step towards the design of a universal, highly accurate functional valid for both molecules and solids. Increasing the non-locality of the exchange and correlation functional in DFT theory comes at a steep increase in computational cost. Here, the authors develop NeuralXC, a supervised machine learning approach to generate density functionals close to coupled-cluster level of accuracy yet computationally efficient.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available