4.8 Article

Fires prime terrestrial organic carbon for riverine export to the global oceans

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PUBLISHING GROUP
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-16576-z

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. UK Natural Environmental Research Council GW4+ studentship [NE/L002434/1]
  2. Leverhulme Trust Research Project Grant [RPG-2014-095]
  3. University of Zurich Forschungskredit Fellowship
  4. SNSF Ambizione grant [PZ00P2_185835]
  5. European Union [663830]
  6. National Science Foundation through the FCE-LTER programme
  7. George Barley Endowment from the Southeast Environmental Research Center at Florida International University
  8. Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research
  9. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [PZ00P2_185835] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Black carbon (BC) is a recalcitrant form of organic carbon (OC) produced by landscape fires. BC is an important component of the global carbon cycle because, compared to unburned biogenic OC, it is selectively conserved in terrestrial and oceanic pools. Here we show that the dissolved BC (DBC) content of dissolved OC (DOC) is twice greater in major (sub)tropical and high-latitude rivers than in major temperate rivers, with further significant differences between biomes. We estimate that rivers export 184 Tg DBC year(-1) globally and that, including particulate BC fluxes, total riverine export amounts to 43 +/- 15 Tg BC year(-1) (12 +/- 5% of the OC flux). While rivers export similar to 1% of the OC sequestered by terrestrial vegetation, our estimates suggest that 34 +/- 26% of the BC produced by landscape fires has an oceanic fate. Biogeochemical models require modification to account for the unique dynamics of BC and to predict the response of recalcitrant OC export to changing environmental conditions.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available