4.8 Article

Transcriptional activity and strain-specific history of mouse pseudogenes

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17157-w

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wellcome Trust [WT108749/Z/15/Z, WT098051, WT202878/Z/16/Z, WT202878/B/16/Z]
  2. Cancer Research UK [20412]
  3. European Research Council [615584]
  4. European Molecular Biology Laboratory
  5. National Human Genome Research Institute of the National Institutes of Health [U41HG007234]
  6. European Union [HEALTH-F4-2010-241504]
  7. BBSRC [BBS/E/T/000PR9819, BB/I025360/1] Funding Source: UKRI
  8. MRC [MR/R017565/1, G0800024] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pseudogenes are ideal markers of genome remodelling. In turn, the mouse is an ideal platform for studying them, particularly with the recent availability of strain-sequencing and transcriptional data. Here, combining both manual curation and automatic pipelines, we present a genome-wide annotation of the pseudogenes in the mouse reference genome and 18 inbred mouse strains (available via the mouse.pseudogene.org resource). We also annotate 165 unitary pseudogenes in mouse, and 303, in human. The overall pseudogene repertoire in mouse is similar to that in human in terms of size, biotype distribution, and family composition (e.g. with GAPDH and ribosomal proteins being the largest families). Notable differences arise in the pseudogene age distribution, with multiple retro-transpositional bursts in mouse evolutionary history and only one in human. Furthermore, in each strain about a fifth of all pseudogenes are unique, reflecting strain-specific evolution. Finally, we find that similar to 15% of the mouse pseudogenes are transcribed, and that highly transcribed parent genes tend to give rise to many processed pseudogenes.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available