4.8 Article

VEGFR2 signaling drives meningeal vascular regeneration upon head injury

Journal

NATURE COMMUNICATIONS
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

NATURE PORTFOLIO
DOI: 10.1038/s41467-020-17545-2

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation of Korea - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [NRF-2018R1A2A1A05022672]
  2. Institute for Basic Science - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [IBS-R025-D1-2015]
  3. Korea Brain Research Institute - Ministry of Science and ICT, Republic of Korea [19-BR-03-04]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Upon severe head injury (HI), blood vessels of the meninges and brain parenchyma are inevitably damaged. While limited vascular regeneration of the injured brain has been studied extensively, our understanding of meningeal vascular regeneration following head injury is quite limited. Here, we identify key pathways governing meningeal vascular regeneration following HI. Rapid and complete vascular regeneration in the meninges is predominantly driven by VEGFR2 signaling. Substantial increase of VEGFR2 is observed in both human patients and mouse models of HI, and endothelial cell-specific deletion of Vegfr2 in the latter inhibits meningeal vascular regeneration. We further identify the facilitating, stabilizing and arresting roles of Tie2, PDGFR beta and Dll4 signaling, respectively, in meningeal vascular regeneration. Prolonged inhibition of this angiogenic process following HI compromises immunological and stromal integrity of the injured meninges. These findings establish a molecular framework for meningeal vascular regeneration after HI, and may guide development of wound healing therapeutics. Severe head injury results in critical damage of blood vessels of the meninges and brain parenchyma. Here, the authors describe key pathways governing meningeal vascular regeneration following head injury, characterizing the differential roles of VEGFR2, Tie2, Dll4 and PDGFR beta signaling.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available