4.5 Article

Understanding and Improving the Membrane Permeability of VH032-Based PROTACs

Journal

ACS MEDICINAL CHEMISTRY LETTERS
Volume 11, Issue 9, Pages 1732-1738

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acsmedchemlett.0c00265

Keywords

Selective degradation; PAMPA; LPE; permeability; structure-permeability relationships

Funding

  1. National Institute of General Medicine Studies of the National Institutes of Health [NIH R01GM131135]
  2. National Science Foundation GRFP [NSF DGE 1339067]
  3. UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (BBSRC) [BB/J001201/2]
  4. European Research Council (ERC) [ERC-2012-StG311460 DrugE3CRLs]
  5. Italian Ministry of Education, University and Research (Miur)
  6. European Commission (Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions Individual Fellowship) [H2020-MSCA-IF-2014-655516]
  7. BBSRC [BB/J001201/2] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Proteolysis targeting chimeras (PROTACs) are catalytic heterobifunctional molecules that can selectively degrade a protein of interest by recruiting a ubiquitin E3 ligase to the target, leading to its ubiquitylation and degradation by the proteasome. Most degraders lie outside the chemical space associated with most membrane-permeable drugs. Although many PROTACs have been described with potent activity in cells, our understanding of the relationship between structure and permeability in these compounds remains limited. Here, we describe a label-free method for assessing the permeability of several VH032-based PROTACs and their components by combining a parallel artificial membrane permeability assay (PAMPA) and a lipophilic permeability efficiency (LPE) metric. Our results show that the combination of these two cell-free membrane permeability assays provides new insight into PROTAC structure-permeability relationships and offers a conceptual framework for predicting the physicochemical properties of PROTACs in order to better inform the design of more permeable and more effective degraders.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available