4.5 Article

Mechanical Reperfusion Following Prolonged Global Cerebral Ischemia Attenuates Brain Injury

Journal

JOURNAL OF CARDIOVASCULAR TRANSLATIONAL RESEARCH
Volume 14, Issue 2, Pages 338-347

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12265-020-10058-9

Keywords

Global cerebral ischemia; Reperfusion; Mechanical circulation

Funding

  1. Uppsala University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The study investigated the effects of prolonged normothermic global cerebral ischemia with controlled brain reperfusion in young adult pigs. It found that adding a customized buffer solution during isolated mechanical brain reperfusion improved outcomes, resulting in lower intracranial pressure, decreased intraparenchymal glycerol, and less signs of excitotoxicity and ischemia, despite similar degrees of injury on histology.
Previous experiments demonstrated improved outcome following prolonged cerebral ischemia given controlled brain reperfusion using extracorporeal circulation. The current study further investigates this. Young adult pigs were exposed to 30 min of global normothermic cerebral ischemia, achieved through intrathoracic clamping of cerebral arteries, followed by 20 min of isolated mechanical brain reperfusion. Leukocyte-filtered blood was delivered by a roller-pump at fixed pressure and flow. One experimental group additionally had a custom-made buffer solution delivered at 1:8 ratio with the blood. Hemodynamics including intracranial pressure were monitored. Blood gases were from peripheral arteries and the sagittal sinus, and intraparenchymal brain microdialysis was performed. The brains were examined by a neuropathologist. The group with the added buffer showed lower intracranial pressure as well as decreased intraparenchymal glycerol and less signs of excitotoxicity and ischemia, although histology revealed similar degrees of injury. A customized mechanical reperfusion improves multiple parameters after prolonged normothermic global cerebral ischemia.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available