An experimental study of mitigating coastal sand dune erosion by microbial- and enzymatic-induced carbonate precipitation

Due to more extreme weather events and accelerating sea-level rise, coastal sand dunes are subjected to more frequent storm wave inundation and surge impacts, which contribute to widespread coastal erosion problems. In this study, two novel bio-mediated methods, microbial-induced carbonate precipitation (MICP) and enzymatic-induced carbonate precipitation (EICP), were investigated and compared for their effectiveness in mitigating sand dune erosion under wave attack. Small-scale laboratory model tests were performed on MICP-treated, EICP-treated, and untreated sand dunes at dune slope angles and two wave intensities for up to 2 h. The cross-shore profile was captured continuously during the course of the erosion test. The erosion volume above the still water level (SWL) and landward retreat distance at the SWL were calculated based on the captured bed profiles. The results show that both EICP and MICP could substantially reduce sand dune erosion at mild-to-moderate wave and dune slope conditions. However, the effectiveness of MICP treatment deteriorated at steeper dune slopes with longer period of wave attack. Under the most adverse condition (i.e., steepest dune slope, biggest wave, and longest period of wave attack), neither EICP nor MICP could effectively mitigate erosion. Fundamentally, the variable effectiveness of MICP and EICP treatment for sand dune erosion control was attributed to the spatial distribution pattern of formed calcite precipitation, which was determined by the way how EICP and MICP were applied. The calcite precipitation was relatively uniform in EICP-treated sand dunes. In MICP-treated ones, however, substantial calcite precipitation concentrated in the shallow surface layer as confirmed by the surface penetration test and SEM observation.

Automated summary

The study investigated novel bio-mediated methods (MICP and EICP) for mitigating sand dune erosion under wave attack. Both methods were effective at mild-to-moderate conditions but less effective under adverse conditions due to different spatial distribution patterns of calcite precipitation.