Journal
WORLD JOURNAL OF UROLOGY
Volume 39, Issue 6, Pages 1815-1823Publisher
SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s00345-020-03363-0
Keywords
Prostate cancer; Metastasis; Bone imaging; Nomogram
Categories
Funding
- Scientific Research Seed Fund of Peking University First Hospital [2018SF043]
- Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipal Science & Technology Commission [7182164]
Ask authors/readers for more resources
The study identified risk predictors for prostate cancer metastasis using contemporary data and assessed the performance of bone imaging indications recommended by NCCN, AUA, and EAU guidelines. Histologic grade group (GG) 5 was found to be the primary factor for distant metastasis (DM) and bone(s)-only metastasis (BM), with NCCN-based recommendations showing higher rationality in clinical practice and nomograms predicting metastasis demonstrating high accuracy.
Purpose We identified the risk predictors related to prostate cancer (PCa) metastasis using contemporary data in a community setting. Then, we assessed the performance of indications for bone imaging recommended from the NCCN, AUA and EAU guidelines. Methods Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2015), we collected clinicopathological information from PCa patients. The associated risk factors found by multivariate analyses were used to establish forest plots and nomograms for distant metastasis (DM) and bone(s)-only metastasis (BM). We next evaluated the NCCN, AUA and EAU guidelines indications for the discovery of certain subgroups of patients who should receive bone imaging. Results A total of 120,136 patients were eligible for analysis, of which 96.7% had no metastasis. The odds ratios of positive DM and BM results were 13.90 times and 15.87 times higher in patients with a histologic grade group (GG) 5 than in the reference group. The concordance index of the nomograms based on race, age, T/N stage, PSA, GG, percentage of positive scores for predicting DM and BM was 0.942 and 0.928, respectively. Performance of the NCCN, AUA and EAU guidelines was high and relatively similar in terms of sensitivity (93.2-96.9%) and negative predictive value (99.8-99.9%). NCCN guidelines had the highest accuracy, specificity and positive likelihood ratio, while negative likelihood ratio was lowest in AUA guideline. Conclusion Histologic GG 5 was the foremost factor for DM and BM. NCCN-based recommendations may be more rational in clinical practice. Nomograms predicting metastasis demonstrate high accuracy.
Authors
I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.
Reviews
Recommended
No Data Available